Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Request
Standard Firewall (Network)
Firewall services that protect the organisation’s network from unauthorised access and other internet security threats.
Anti-virus Software Application
Programs designed to prevent, detect, and remove viruses, malware, trojans, adware, and related threats.
Microsoft Enterprise Agreement
A volume licensing agreement that may include:
Microsoft Power BI
Or any alternative business intelligence platform used for data connectivity, dashboards, and reporting.
For each of the above areas, I kindly request the following:
Q1. Who is the existing supplier for this contract?
Q2. What is the annual spend for each contract?
Q3. What is the description of the services provided?
Q4. Primary brand (where applicable)
Q5. What is the start date of the contract?
Q6. What is the expiry date of the contract?
Q7. What is the total duration of the contract?
Q8. Who is the responsible contract officer? Please include at least their job title, and where possible, name, contact number, and direct email address
Q9. How many licences or users are included (where applicable)?
Extent and Result of Searches to Locate Information
To locate the information relevant to your request searches were conducted within North Yorkshire Police.
I can confirm that the information you have requested is held by North Yorkshire Police.
Decision
I have today decided to disclose the following information to you.
Q1-9. Please see the table below containing North Yorkshire Police’s response to your request.
|
|
Standard Firewall (Network) |
Anti Virus Software |
Microsoft Enterprise Agreement |
Microsoft Power BI |
|
Q1. |
Insight (fortinet) |
Phoenix Software |
Phoenix Software |
Phoenix Software |
|
Q2. |
Exempt – S43(2) |
Exempt – S43(2) |
Exempt – S43(2) |
Exempt – S43(2) |
|
Q3. |
Support and Maintenance |
Sophos Central Intercept 470 x Server Licences |
Microsoft Enterprise Agreement |
Microsoft Enterprise Agreement |
|
Q4. |
Fortigate/Fortinet |
Sophos |
Microsoft |
Microsoft |
|
Q5. |
23/12/2023 |
12/08/2021 |
10/01/2022 |
10/01/2022 |
|
Q6. |
22/12/2028 |
12/07/2026 |
30/09/2025 |
30/09/2025 |
|
Q7. |
5 years |
5 Years |
3 years |
3 years |
|
Q8. |
Infrastructure Manager Personal information exempt – S40(2) |
Infrastructure Manager Personal information exempt – S40(2) |
Head of ICT |
Head of ICT Personal information exempt – S40(2) |
|
Q9. |
N/A |
470 |
4500 |
3 |
Q2. I am exempting North Yorkshire Police’s annual spend on this software pursuant to Section 43(2) Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act).
Q8. I am exempting the contact details of the responsible officer pursuant to Section 40(2) of the Act.
Please see the below exemption explanation.
Exemption Explanation
Section 17 of the Act requires North Yorkshire Police, when refusing to provide such information (because the information is exempt) to provide you the applicant with a notice which: (a) states that fact, (b) specifies the exemption in question and (c) states (if that would not otherwise be apparent) why the exemption applies.
Section 40(2) – Personal Information
Where an individual can be identified by such data, releasing it would clearly breach the first data protection principle of being ‘fair’ to the data subject.
Section 40(2) is an absolute class based exemption, which does not require a public interest test, but requires the balancing of the legitimate interests of the public against the interests of the individual under the first Data Protection Principle; in that processing of personal data must be lawful and fair (DPA 2018 35(1), EUGDPR Article 5(1)).
This exemption applies because the right given under the FOI Act to request official information held by public authorities does not apply to the personal data of third parties where disclosure of that information would not be fair to the individual, and where there is no legitimate public interest in disclosure.
In all the circumstances of the case it has been determined that the duty to the individual under the Data Protection Act 2018 & EU General Data Protection Regulations, and the public interest in maintaining the exemption from disclosure of personal information held by the force in such instances, outweighs the public interest in disclosure. In this instance, personal information can only be disclosed to the individual concerned.
Releasing personal details to a person other than the data subject would not only breach the data subject’s Data Protection rights it may also breach the obligations placed on an authority under the European Convention on Human Rights.
Section 43(2) – Commercial Interests
This is a qualified, class based exemption, which requires that I conduct a public interest test to balance the legitimate interests of the public in knowing the information against the interests of non-disclosure. This exemption applies because the disclosure of the requested information would, or would be likely to, prejudice commercial interests.
Public Interest Test
Factors Favouring Disclosure
There is a strong public interest in the efficiency of public sector spending. Releasing the information would provide the public with the knowledge on what the force spend on the subject matter. Disclosure would provide openness, displaying that public funds are being spent correctly and efficiently.
Factors Favouring Non-Disclosure
Disclosure of suppliers products into the public domain would likely deter suppliers from entering future tendering processes and it would put their competition at advantage. This would also impact North Yorkshire Police’s and other force’s ability to conduct fair tendering. Trust would be lost in the forces ability to conduct business and the community would be affected by the force being unable to spend public funds as effectively.
Balancing Test
The disclosure of commercially sensitive information would prejudice the commercial interests of the company involved and may deter them and others from participating in future procurement initiatives. There is a strong public interest against disclosure where that disclosure would be likely to prejudice the Force’s own commercial interests. Disclosure of the information would be likely to adversely affect the bargaining position of North Yorkshire Police during future contractual negotiations relating to current and future contracts which would result in less effective use of public money.
The public interest would not be served where disclosure of commercial information would hinder fair and open competition for public sector contracts. As such the balance is considered in favour of non-disclosure.
Pursuant to Section 17(1) of the Act this acts as a Refusal Notice in relation to the exempted parts of your request.
Please note that systems used for recording information are not generic, nor are the procedures used locally in capturing the data. It should be noted therefore that this force’s response to your questions should not be used for comparison purposes with any other responses you may receive.